# Content Depth Report

**Post:** lexikon/revisionssicherheit
**Generated:** 2026-03-20 11:39:10

## Competitor Word Counts

| Position | Domain | Word Count |
|----------|--------|------------|
| #1 | wikipedia.org | 769 |
| #2 | d-velop.de | 1,590 |
| #3 | gabler.de | 355 |
| #4 | easy-software.com | 738 |
| #5 | universal-search-box.com | 0 |
| #6 | doxis.com | 1,808 |
| #7 | microtech.de | 499 |
| #8 | edoc.de | 327 |
| #9 | css.de | 4,026 |
| #10 | docuvita.de | 834 |
| #11 | cto.de | 1,267 |
| #12 | orgamax.de | 788 |
| #13 | veda.net | 6,732 |
| #14 | candis.io | 1,913 |
| #15 | scopevisio.com | 1,676 |

**Average:** 1,555 words

## Competitive Depth Target

- **Recommended Target:** 2,100 words

## Outline vs Target

No target in CONTENT_OUTLINE.md. Set from data/competitive-depth-analysis.md.

## Current Post Gap

- **Current word count:** 0 words
- **Gap to recommended target:** 2,100 words

## Missing Topics (from competitive-depth)

- Revisionssicherheit
- Inhaltsverzeichnis
- Literatur
- Weblinks
- Was ist revisionssicherheit? 
- Richtigkeit 
- Vollständigkeit 
- Nachvollziehbarkeit 
- Prüfbarkeit 
- Autor:in

## Unique Value Reminder

Before writing, ensure CONTENT_OUTLINE.md Unique Value section has ≥1 item checked (original data, expert insights, better format, freshness, use case). See SKYSCRAPER_TECHNIQUE_2026.md.

## Suggested Next Steps

1. Review data/competitive-depth-analysis.md for full recommendations
2. Set CONTENT_OUTLINE.md target from competitive-depth (minimum 80% of recommended)
3. Add H2 sections to cover missing topics
4. Complete SERP_ANALYSIS.md manual sections (30 min browser review)
5. Run `php v2/scripts/blog/check-outline-h2-overlap.php --post=revisionssicherheit --category=lexikon` to avoid duplicate H2s
6. Run `php v2/scripts/blog/validate-content-outline-quality.php --post=revisionssicherheit --category=lexikon` before content creation